A genuinely conscious web developer, Jeremy Hammond is accused of using his computer savvy to attack conservative groups and State operators. He is being charged with providing Wikileaks the documents for their latest Stratfor release.
Being served with an intervention order is unsettling. The process is quick, the consequences are immediate, and the implications often extend well beyond the conduct that triggered the application.
This article explains what an intervention order in Victoria involves: the law, the process, the practical consequences, the defences, and when to engage a lawyer.
Nothing here replaces tailored legal advice from a senior criminal defence lawyer.
An intervention order is a civil order made by a court that imposes conditions on a person's conduct toward another. In Victoria, family violence intervention orders are made under the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 (Vic), and personal safety intervention orders are made under the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 (Vic). An intervention order is not a criminal charge in itself. The order can prohibit contact, restrict approach to a residence or workplace, restrict use of property, and impose other conditions. Breach of the order is a separate criminal offence.
The two types of order apply to different relationships. Family violence intervention orders apply where the parties are in a family relationship — including current or former intimate partners, family members, and certain carer relationships. Personal safety intervention orders apply where the parties are not in a family relationship — covering neighbours, colleagues, or other contexts. The legislation, the conduct that founds the application, and some procedural elements differ between the two. Both can be made on an interim basis, before a final hearing, where there is sufficient need.
Breach of an intervention order is a criminal offence with significant penalties. The conduct that constitutes a breach is anything that contravenes a condition of the order — including contact prohibited by the order, attendance at restricted places, or other conduct contrary to the order's terms. Police can arrest for breach. The offence carries a substantial maximum penalty, with higher maximums where the breach involves violence or repeated breaches. A conviction for breach creates a criminal record. Even a single breach can have serious consequences for bail in any related proceedings and for future intervention order applications.
For an intervention order application, you will typically be served with the application and notice of hearing, not arrested. For a breach of an existing order, arrest is common, particularly where the alleged breach involves violence or repeated conduct. Summons may be used for less serious breach matters or where the breach is established after the event. If arrested for breach, you may be held in custody pending bail or court appearance. The order itself may be served by police at any time.
Generally no, not without legal advice first. You have a right to silence in a police interview and the strong general advice in matters connected to intervention orders is to obtain legal representation before any record of interview. In intervention order matters, what you say about contact, your understanding of the order, or events surrounding the application can affect both the order itself and any breach proceedings. The decision to participate in interview should be made on legal advice that is specific to your circumstances.
Bail for breach of an intervention order is governed by the Bail Act 1977 (Vic). For breaches involving family violence, more demanding bail tests can apply. Bail conditions in family violence matters typically include strict non-contact directions, residence conditions, and reporting requirements. The court will consider the seriousness of the alleged breach, the safety of the protected person, and the accused's history. Bail outcomes in family violence breach matters can be more restrictive than in other contexts. Whether bail will be granted depends on the circumstances of the case.
A committal generally does not apply to intervention order applications themselves — those are civil proceedings heard in the Magistrates' Court. For criminal charges arising from breach of an intervention order, most matters are dealt with summarily in the Magistrates' Court, but more serious breach charges or related criminal charges may be indictable and require committal. The committal is the Magistrates' Court process for indictable matters that determines whether the case should proceed to trial in a higher court.
It depends. Intervention order proceedings are generally heard in open court, though the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 (Vic) provides for restrictions on publication of certain information. Suppression orders in this context are specific and limited. The order itself is between the parties, but breach proceedings are criminal matters that appear on court lists. Employers in regulated industries — particularly those involving children, vulnerable people, or firearms — may have reporting requirements triggered by intervention orders or breach charges. Family awareness often follows from the events that led to the order rather than the proceedings themselves.
An intervention order itself does not typically restrict international travel, but conditions of the order may include restrictions on approaching certain places. For breach proceedings or related criminal charges, surrender of passport may be imposed as a bail condition where there is a flight risk or international elements. Pre-existing travel plans can sometimes be accommodated through bail variation applications. Travel decisions while an intervention order is in place should consider whether any condition of the order would be breached during travel.
An intervention order is a civil order and does not typically appear on a standard criminal record check, because it is not a criminal conviction. However, the existence of intervention orders is recorded on police databases and can appear on more comprehensive checks for sensitive roles. Convictions for breach of an intervention order do appear on criminal record checks. Working with children checks, working with vulnerable people checks, firearms licence applications, and certain regulated employment may consider intervention orders even where a criminal record check would not. The detail depends on the type of check and the role.
For an intervention order application, the response can include contesting the order at the final hearing, consenting without admissions, or negotiating conditions. Contesting means putting the applicant to proof at hearing. Consenting without admissions means accepting the order without admitting the conduct alleged, which avoids findings being made. For breach charges, defences include lack of knowledge of the order's terms, factual dispute about the conduct, accident, or that the conduct did not in fact contravene a condition of the order. Each strategy has implications for related proceedings — including family law and criminal matters.
Intervention order applications can resolve quickly — sometimes within weeks if consented to, longer if contested at a final hearing. Contested final hearings are typically listed several months after the interim order. Breach criminal charges follow normal Magistrates' Court timelines and may resolve within months for summary matters or longer for more serious charges. The timeline depends on the complexity of the matter, the volume of evidence, and the parties' positions on resolution. Connected family law and criminal proceedings can extend the overall timeline considerably.
For breach charges, a plea of guilty involves accepting the charge and proceeding to sentence, usually attracting a sentencing discount, particularly when entered early. Contesting the charge at hearing means requiring the prosecution to prove the breach beyond reasonable doubt. For the order itself, the equivalent decision is whether to consent — with or without admissions — or contest the application at final hearing. Each path has different implications for the criminal record, related family law proceedings, and any future allegations. Senior legal advice is essential before deciding.
Intervention order matters sit at the intersection of civil and criminal law and connect with family law in many cases. The Family Violence Protection Act 2008 (Vic) framework, the bail considerations in family violence matters, and the criminal law of breach all need careful handling. Decisions made in the order proceedings — particularly whether to consent and on what terms — affect later criminal proceedings and family law positions. A lawyer experienced in this area can advise on the connected implications. Family law strategy itself sits outside criminal practice and requires separate specialist advice.
Immediately. Before any contact with police if possible, and certainly before any record of interview. In intervention order matters, the first decisions — whether to attend the first hearing, whether to consent or contest, what to say to police — set the framework for everything that follows. If you have been served with an intervention order or are aware that an application is being made, the time to call a lawyer is before the first court appearance.
Early engagement of senior counsel materially affects outcomes in intervention order matters. The decisions made at the interim and final hearing stages, and in any breach proceedings, often constrain or expand options in connected family law and criminal matters.
If you have been served with an intervention order, are facing a breach charge, or expect either, contact our office for a confidential discussion of your circumstances.
Please comment and share with your friends!