A genuinely conscious web developer, Jeremy Hammond is accused of using his computer savvy to attack conservative groups and State operators. He is being charged with providing Wikileaks the documents for their latest Stratfor release.
Ending a marriage and sorting out the money are two separate legal processes. A divorce dissolves the marriage; it does not, on its own, divide your finances. This guide explains how financial settlements work in England and Wales in 2026, the principles the courts apply, and the reforms now under active consultation.
Finances on divorce are divided by the family court through a financial remedy order, guided by the factors in section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. There is no automatic 50/50 rule. Instead the court aims for a fair outcome, and fairness is assessed against three principles developed through case law: needs, sharing and compensation.
The section 25 factors the court must weigh include:
The first consideration is always the welfare of any child of the family under 18. In most everyday cases the couple's needs — somewhere suitable to live and enough to live on — absorb all the available assets, so arguments about who "earned" what never arise.
No. Since the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 came into force on 6 April 2022, England and Wales has had a no-fault divorce system, and no one has to prove blame. But obtaining the final divorce order does nothing to divide your assets or end your financial claims against each other.
To achieve certainty you need a financial order — either a consent order approved by the court where you agree, or a contested financial remedy order where you do not. Without one, financial claims can remain open indefinitely. In Wyatt v Vince (2015), a former wife was allowed to bring a claim many years after the divorce because no final order had ever been made. A properly drafted order, ideally including a clean break, is what closes the door for good.
Matrimonial property is, broadly, the wealth built up by the couple during the marriage through joint endeavour — the family home, savings, and pensions accrued while married. Non-matrimonial property is wealth separate from the marriage, such as inheritances, gifts from third parties, or assets one spouse owned before the relationship began.
The distinction was sharpened significantly by the Supreme Court in Standish v Standish (2025), decided on 2 July 2025 — the first time in almost two decades the highest court had examined the sharing principle. The court confirmed that:
The practical message from Standish is that how a couple treat an asset during the marriage is decisive. Keeping inherited or pre-owned wealth clearly separate makes it far more likely to stay outside the shared pot.
The family home is usually the most emotionally charged asset and is almost always treated as matrimonial property, regardless of whose name is on the title. The court's options include:
Because the welfare of any children comes first, securing a stable home for them frequently shapes the whole settlement.
Pensions are one of the largest assets in many marriages and one of the most commonly overlooked. They can be dealt with in three main ways:
Pensions are complex to value fairly — the cash-equivalent figure rarely reflects the true income they will produce — so an actuarial report is often needed. Ignoring pensions in a settlement can leave one party, frequently the lower earner, significantly worse off in retirement.
Spousal maintenance (also called periodical payments) is money paid by one former spouse to the other after divorce. It is still awarded, but the modern approach favours a clean break wherever the finances allow, so the parties become financially independent of one another as soon as reasonably possible.
Where maintenance is ordered, courts increasingly make it for a fixed term designed to help the recipient transition to independence, rather than for life. The idea of a "meal ticket for life" has fallen firmly out of favour in recent case law.
Child maintenance is separate. It is normally calculated by the Child Maintenance Service using a formula based on the paying parent's gross income, rather than decided by the family court, although the court retains a role in higher-income "top-up" cases and for school fees.
Under current law, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements are not automatically binding, but they carry real weight. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Radmacher v Granatino (2010), a court will give effect to a nuptial agreement freely entered into by each party, with a full appreciation of its implications, unless it would be unfair to hold them to it.
To give an agreement the best chance of being upheld, couples are advised to ensure full financial disclosure, independent legal advice for both parties, no pressure, and signing well before the wedding. This position may soon change — see the reforms below.
Most financial settlements are reached without a contested final hearing. Non-court dispute resolution is now actively encouraged by the family courts, and the rules require parties to consider it seriously. The main options are:
Whichever route is used, both parties must give full and frank financial disclosure — usually through a Form E. Deliberately hiding assets can cause any resulting order to be set aside, so honesty is not just ethical but strategically sensible.
The law of financial remedies is under its most serious review in a generation. After the Law Commission's December 2024 scoping report concluded that the current law lacks certainty and accessibility, the Ministry of Justice launched a public consultation, "A Fairer End to Relationships," which ran from 5 June to 14 August 2026.
The consultation invites views on a "codification-plus" model, which would bring the settled principles of needs and sharing into statute for the first time, making outcomes more predictable. It also proposes qualifying nuptial agreements — prenups and postnups that would be binding where defined safeguards are met — and considers new financial rights for separating cohabitants. Any resulting legislation is still some way off, but couples marrying now, or negotiating settlements, should be aware that the framework is likely to evolve.
No. There is no automatic 50/50 split in England and Wales. The court starts from fairness and applies the section 25 factors, prioritising the parties' needs and the welfare of any children. An equal division is common in longer marriages with straightforward finances, but the split can be very different where needs, non-matrimonial property or short marriages are involved.
Indefinitely, unless a financial order has been made. The final divorce order does not end financial claims. A former spouse can bring a claim years later if the finances were never resolved by a court order, which is why a clean-break consent order is strongly recommended even where a couple agree.
Often, but not always. Inheritances are usually treated as non-matrimonial property and fall outside the sharing principle. However, they can be drawn on to meet the other party's reasonable needs, and can become shareable if the couple have treated the money as a joint asset over time. Keeping an inheritance separate makes it far more likely to be ring-fenced.
Possibly. Pensions built up during the marriage are matrimonial property and can be shared through a pension sharing order or offset against other assets. Pensions are frequently the largest asset after the family home, so they should always be valued and factored into a settlement rather than ignored.
A prenuptial agreement is not automatically binding, but a court will usually uphold one that was freely entered into, with full disclosure and independent legal advice, unless doing so would be unfair. Proposed 2026 reforms may make properly safeguarded "qualifying" agreements binding in future.
Even where a couple agree, the agreement should be recorded in a consent order and approved by the court to make it legally binding and final. Without a sealed order, either party can reopen the finances later. A solicitor ensures the order is drafted correctly and achieves a clean break where possible.
Grant Saw, A family law team based in Greenwich, South East London. 25 years advising on divorce and financial settlements;This article is general information about the law of England and Wales as at August 2026 and is not legal advice. The law of financial remedies is under active reform and individual circumstances vary widely. Anyone facing divorce should take advice from a qualified family solicitor before acting.
Please comment and share with your friends!